Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Organizational Innovation , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Risk Management/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Humans , State Medicine/organization & administration , State Medicine/standards , United KingdomABSTRACT
The use of telehealth technology to connect with patients has expanded significantly over the past several years, particularly in response to the global coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This technical report describes the present state of telehealth and its current and potential applications. Telehealth has the potential to transform the way care is delivered to pediatric patients, expanding access to pediatric care across geographic distances, leveraging the pediatric workforce for care delivery, and improving disparities in access to care. However, implementation will require significant efforts to address the digital divide to ensure that telehealth does not inadvertently exacerbate inequities in care. The medical home model will continue to evolve to use telehealth to provide high-quality care for children, particularly for children and youth with special health care needs, in accordance with current and evolving quality standards. Research and metric development are critical for the development of evidence-based best practices and policies in these new models of care. Finally, as pediatric care transitions from traditional fee-for-service payment to alternative payment methods, telehealth offers unique opportunities to establish value-based population health models that are financed in a sustainable manner.
Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Pediatrics/methods , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Patient-Centered Care/economics , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Pediatrics/economics , Pediatrics/standards , Telemedicine/economics , Telemedicine/standards , United StatesSubject(s)
Critical Care/organization & administration , Health Equity/organization & administration , Health Facility Planning/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Critical Care/standards , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Quality of Health Care/standardsSubject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Care Rationing/trends , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Pathology, Clinical/trends , Quality of Health Care/trends , Referral and Consultation/trends , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Pathology, Clinical/methods , Pathology, Clinical/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , State Medicine/organization & administration , State Medicine/trends , United KingdomSubject(s)
COVID-19/nursing , Nursing Care/organization & administration , Nursing Care/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/supply & distribution , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Adult , Anniversaries and Special Events , Female , History of Nursing , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurse's RoleABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has demanded rapid institutional responses to meet the needs of patients and employees in the face of a serious new disease. To support the well-being of frontline staff, a series of debriefing sessions was used to drive a rapid-cycle quality-improvement process. The goals were to confidentially determine personal coping strategies used by staff, provide an opportunity for staff cross-learning, identify what staff needed most, and provide a real-time feedback loop for decision-makers to create rapid changes to support staff safety and coping. Data were collected via sticky notes on flip charts to protect confidentiality. Management reviewed the data daily. Institutional responses to problems identified during debrief sessions were tracked, visualized, addressed, and shared with staff. More than 10% of staff participated over a 2-week period. Feedback influenced institutional decisions to improve staff schedules, transportation, and COVID-19 training.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , COVID-19/epidemiology , Faith-Based Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Healthcare/methods , Tertiary Healthcare/statistics & numerical data , Faith-Based Organizations/standards , Hospitals/standards , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Kenya/epidemiology , Medical Staff, Hospital/education , Medical Staff, Hospital/psychology , Medical Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Healthcare/standardsABSTRACT
SUMMARY: Founded in 1897 as a 12-bed hospital and training school in Springfield, Illinois, Memorial Health System (MHS) today serves communities throughout central Illinois with five affiliated hospitals, ambulatory care services, and behavioral health programs. The system includes Memorial Medical Center in Springfield, Abraham Lincoln Memorial Hospital in Lincoln, Taylorville Memorial Hospital in Taylorville, Passavant Area Hospital in Jacksonville, Decatur Memorial Hospital in Decatur, and the Memorial Physician Services, Memorial Home Services, and Memorial Behavioral Health network across central Illinois. The evolution of MHS from a system in name only-lacking full integration of organizational functions-to its current status as an optimized health system has been marked by challenges, from the initial doubts of employees and the community to the upheaval caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Systemness requires visionary and sure-handed leadership to identify and realize economies of scale, share best practices for operational improvements, and reduce unwanted variation to improve quality of care. As the MHS story illustrates, that all starts, grows, and endures with strategic planning.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Organizational Innovation , Organizational Objectives , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , Illinois , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
SUMMARY: While the term systemness has been used in the healthcare sector for decades, its definition varies from organization to organization. Still, the goals are consistent: to improve patient experience, lower costs, reduce risk, and provide insights into a wide range of care and management issues. Most health systems face similar challenges, such as margin enhancement, quality improvement, increased access, and fending off disruptive competition. Systemness is a way to address these challenges while improving the overall interdependence of the organization. Although embraced by and advantageous to healthcare organizations, systemness efforts often fail. The obstacles are surmountable when organizations thoroughly analyze the achievable scale of systemness, community resources, and current mindset regarding the good of the whole. Leaders must play a vital role in promoting systemness by providing education and a routine review of day-to-day organizational activities. Sometimes, systemness requires a change in leadership or an updating of leadership skills.Organizations must recognize and assess their culture as it relates to principles of independence versus interdependence, and refocus clinical standardization through best-practice protocols and policies as COVID-19 affects the already-fractured healthcare sector. Fortunately, current and developing artificial intelligence, wearables, at-home testing, and improved technologies promise to provide a needed break for a contracting physician field and fatigued front line, and they present an opportunity for those organizations poised to meet the systemness challenge.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Intersectoral Collaboration , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , Organizational Culture , Organizational Objectives , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
COVID-19 has exposed the longstanding internal problems in nursing homes and the weak structures and policies that are meant to protect residents. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services convened the Coronavirus Commission for Safety and Quality in NHs in April, 2020 to address this situation by recommending steps to improve infection prevention and control, safety procedures, and the quality of life of residents in nursing homes. The authors of this paper respond to the Final Report of the Commission and put forth additional recommendations to federal policymakers for meaningful nursing home reform: 1) ensuring 24/7 registered nurse (RN) coverage and adequate compensation to maintain total staffing levels that are based on residents' care needs; 2) ensuring RNs have geriatric nursing and leadership competencies; 3) increasing efforts to recruit and retain the NH workforce, particularly RNs; and 4) supporting care delivery models that strengthen the role of the RN for quality resident-centered care.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Infection Control/organization & administration , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , Nursing Staff/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Aged , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Personnel Staffing and Scheduling , United StatesABSTRACT
The challenges for health care continue to grow and in the 21st century healthcare policymakers and providers will need to respond to the developing impact of global warming and the environmental impact of healthcare service delivery. This cannot be viewed apart from the current Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, which is likely to be linked to the climate crisis.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Climate Change , Conservation of Natural Resources , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Humans , Internationality , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Humans , Pandemics , Primary Health Care/methods , United States/epidemiologySubject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Child Health Services/organization & administration , Medicaid/organization & administration , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pandemics , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Residence Characteristics , SARS-CoV-2 , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiologySubject(s)
COVID-19 , Efficiency, Organizational/economics , Health Care Reform/economics , Quality of Health Care/economics , Reimbursement, Incentive , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Efficiency, Organizational/standards , Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Humans , Pandemics , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Spain/epidemiologyABSTRACT
COVID-19 has created a significant distraction from normal practice operations. The uncertainty that comes along with the pandemic is a huge worry, and can distract from practice transformation.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Neoplasms/therapy , Appointments and Schedules , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Pandemics , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Time-to-Treatment , Uncertainty , United StatesABSTRACT
Public health emergencies, such as the current SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic, have led to tragic resource constraints that prevent lives from being saved. This has led to tensions in patient-centered care as the backbone of the system in normal conditions and the same care in emergencies originating in the COVID-19. In this review we address some of the healthcare, organizational and ethical problems that this scenario has caused in primary care such as: cancellation of programmed activities; scarce home care and follow-up of elderly, chronically ill and immobilized patients; shortage of PPE and the exposure to risk of healthcare professionals, and finally the problems associated with telemedicine and telephone attention to patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Care Rationing/ethics , Health Services Accessibility/ethics , Infection Control/methods , Primary Health Care/ethics , Telemedicine/ethics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Care Rationing/methods , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services for the Aged/ethics , Health Services for the Aged/organization & administration , Humans , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/organization & administration , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/ethics , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Spain/epidemiology , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administrationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3-4 weeks. Patients call this "long Covid". We sought to document such patients' lived experience, including accessing and receiving healthcare and ideas for improving services. METHODS: We held 55 individual interviews and 8 focus groups (n = 59) with people recruited from UK-based long Covid patient support groups, social media and snowballing. We restricted some focus groups to health professionals since they had already self-organised into online communities. Participants were invited to tell their stories and comment on others' stories. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVIVO. Analysis incorporated sociological theories of illness, healing, peer support, clinical relationships, access, and service redesign. RESULTS: Of 114 participants aged 27-73 years, 80 were female. Eighty-four were White British, 13 Asian, 8 White Other, 5 Black, and 4 mixed ethnicity. Thirty-two were doctors and 19 other health professionals. Thirty-one had attended hospital, of whom 8 had been admitted. Analysis revealed a confusing illness with many, varied and often relapsing-remitting symptoms and uncertain prognosis; a heavy sense of loss and stigma; difficulty accessing and navigating services; difficulty being taken seriously and achieving a diagnosis; disjointed and siloed care (including inability to access specialist services); variation in standards (e.g. inconsistent criteria for seeing, investigating and referring patients); variable quality of the therapeutic relationship (some participants felt well supported while others felt "fobbed off"); and possible critical events (e.g. deterioration after being unable to access services). Emotionally significant aspects of participants' experiences informed ideas for improving services. CONCLUSION: Suggested quality principles for a long Covid service include ensuring access to care, reducing burden of illness, taking clinical responsibility and providing continuity of care, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, evidence-based investigation and management, and further development of the knowledge base and clinical services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04435041.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Focus Groups , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Time Factors , United KingdomSubject(s)
Ambulatory Care/standards , COVID-19/prevention & control , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Remote Consultation/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Chronic Disease/therapy , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care/standards , Quarantine , Remote Consultation/methods , Remote Consultation/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background/aim: The aim of this research is to evaluate the relationship between the quality of health and accreditation standards with the Covid-19 process and to reveal the importance of quality and accreditation in health care in the process of combating coronavirus. Materials and methods: The relationship between hospital accreditation standards of Turkish Healthcare Quality and Accreditation Institute and the Covid-19 process was evaluated. The standards were analyzed within the framework of the technical guidance areas provided by the World Health Organization for countries for the Covid-19 process. Results: The standards were found to be 79,6% related to the Covid-19 process. The standard set including risk management, health and safety of employees, patient safety, end of life services, prevention of infections, drug management, sterilization management, laboratory services, waste management, outsourcing, material and device management, adverse event reporting, corporate communication, and social responsibilities sections are 100% related to the Covid-19 process. Conclusion: Studies on quality and accreditation in health services are important in terms of being prepared for Covid-19 and similar epidemic and pandemic situations, and to carry out planned and effective management of the process.